Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Passover is tough for Breadatarians
Blind People Make Others Feel Guilty When They Don't Wear Sunglasses or an Eye Patch
One may argue that to avoid eye contact at all times would impose a large personal burden on the blind person and make social interaction awkward. I ask that person: is it not awkward enough already? Anyone who has watched an episode of American Idol this season or even had a simple conversation with someone afflicted with a “wandering eye” knows it’s incredibly difficult to determine where to look. It’s not like the blind guy can look back at you, at least not literally. Have you ever tried to high-five a blind guy? Give him the thumbs up? The middle finger? They just don’t get it. Covering up this infirmity would no doubt make others more willing to interact with a blind person, who would ultimately receive a benefit from being somewhat incorporated into normal society.
I refer you to pictures included herein.
At the left is a picture we might characterize as a weird looking guy with dead eyes; at the right, a picture of a really cool dude who is probably a badass musician. Here’s the catch: The pictures are of the same person! I just added some cool shades to a stock photo of blind Idol contestant Scott MacIntyre. The result was overwhelming.By donning sunglasses or an eye patch, the blind man does society a service by excusing others from having to look at his deformity. So stop being selfish, blindies, and start wearing blinders. (But make sure you have someone whose eyes function pick out a pair to make sure they look good on you. You know, because you can’t see.)
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Monday, April 6, 2009
Winters are brutal in Chicago

We Are Still Living in a Post-9/11 World

Sunday, April 5, 2009
New Study Reveals Trail of Tears Not Literally Made of Tears
We’re all familiar with the story. Andrew Jackson signs the Indian Removal Act, people get upset, and he delivers a patriotic speech: “Oh, are you sad that we’re removing you from your sacred land and forcing you to walk to your new home in the shittiest, driest region of this land mass we claim a superior right to? Cry me a river, I’ll build you a boat.”
So they did. The Indians cried and cried until their tears formed a beautiful raging river westward from the present day southern United States. And even though President Jackson never gave them their boats, they followed this river to their new home, and lived happily ever after…
Until yesterday I believed this American Tale was not only incredibly inspirational, but historically accurate as well. Disturbingly, scientists have just discovered that the path upon which these disenfranchised individuals tread was made of rock and dirt, not tears.
Dr. Steve* (pictured) was willing to concede that they may have formed a small puddle, but certainly no river: “Contrary to popular belief, the Choctaw and Cherokee were forcibly removed to the West via a trail of earth, not a trail of actual tears. Although I’m fairly confident they were crying a lot at the time, it is scientifically improbable that they shed enough tears to create an entire river. I’m willing to bet a lot of those tears didn’t even fall to the ground, but were caught by hands or the back of a sleeve.”
To which Chief Bob* responded, “Anything is possible.”
Protestors outside Science Laboratories* were furious. “I feel like I’ve been lied to for years,” said fourth grade teacher, Mary*. “Trail of tears? More like trail of lies! We just finished that chapter in history class. Now what am I supposed to tell my students?”
This new discovery will surely call for some major re-writes, ranging from textbooks to even the Constitution. The President declined to comment on the issue at this time, but Governors and Senators alike are encouraging everyone to remain calm.
* All names have been changed to protect the identity of those involved.

